Elo Development

Series History

Hover with the mouse to show details.

de Nili

2067 ±0 2067

0

vs.

0

66% - Prediction - 34%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1951 ±0 1951

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

ar Tatengue

1907 +7 1914

+5+5−3

2

vs.

1

43% - Prediction - 57%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1958 −7 1951

−5−5+3

ar iDabs

1968 −10 1958

−5−5

0

vs.

2

60% - Prediction - 40%

Show Details

ar Tatengue

1896 +10 1906

+5+5

ar iDabs

1968 ±0 1968

0

vs.

0

51% - Prediction - 49%

Show Details

cl Whocl

1959 ±0 1959

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

ar Tatengue

1898 +10 1908

+5+5

2

vs.

0

39% - Prediction - 61%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1978 −10 1968

−5−5

tw Sora Kuma

2083 +6 2089

+3+3

2

vs.

0

64% - Prediction - 36%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1984 −6 1978

−3−3

tw z40305125

1992 +8 2000

+4+4

2

vs.

0

50% - Prediction - 50%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1992 −8 1984

−4−4

de Nili

2055 ±0 2055

0

vs.

0

59% - Prediction - 41%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1992 ±0 1992

The result was exactly like expected, so no Elo changes.

ar prisma09

1959 +8 1967

+4+4

2

vs.

0

44% - Prediction - 56%

Show Details

ar iDabs

2000 −8 1992

−4−4

vn BacT

2148 −2 2146

+2+2−6

2

vs.

1

70% - Prediction - 30%

Show Details

ar iDabs

1998 +2 2000

−2−2+6

BacT still lost points to iDabs, because the victory was closer than expected.

es TaToH

2353 +2 2355

+1+1

2

vs.

0

88% - Prediction - 12%

Show Details

ar iDabs

2000 −2 1998

−1−1

Tournament Participations
Most Frequent Opponents
ar Tatengue3x0x won (0%)Compare...
de Nili2x0x won (0%)Compare...
es TaToH1x0x won (0%)Compare...
vn BacT1x0x won (0%)Compare...
cl Whocl1x0x won (0%)Compare...
Most Surprising Results

Coming soon...